http://www.autotrader.co.uk/EDITORIAL/c ... 36636.html

this will probably be a repost since im not exactly mr current affairs!

they are great! I won't have a word said bad about them, my old man had one and with the twin slide doors and rear hatch you could stuff loads into them, hills,head winds and fast corners where a problem but best van I've ever been in. although the 3.0 petrol bedford was a peach.tenkfeet wrote:What do you expect from a Bedford Rascal !
Not the safest! I was washing my car in my parents drive way, about 12 years ago, when I heard an almighty crash; ran to the end of the drive way to see the aftermath of a head on collision: Pug 405 & beford Rascal. Rascal driver was hanging out through the windscreen; legs trapped. The police later said that each vehicle had been doing approx 45 MPH (in a 30) so had an impact speed of 90MPH. The pugeot driver had been drunkjj wrote:You like Bedford Rascals but not a Veyron. Odd.![]()
![]()
My dad had one in about 93 and it wouldnt do more than 70mph, it was tiny (utterly pointless) and with the engine under the passenger seat, every time you braked hard it felt like it was going to roll up onto its nose!
Yes but Dom you have the brittle bones of a vitamin deprived slave child forced to live underground away from the sun digging coal to reduce you daily beatings.Dominic wrote:jj wrote: Having broken several bones myself, he probably did not even feel it at the time!