Breaking news..........

Anything goes in here.....
User avatar
Scotty C
Meat
Posts: 8352
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 12:11 am
Location: Aberdeen

Post by Scotty C » Fri Sep 14, 2007 12:12 pm

the whole thing is a bit of a farce, wish Ron would pull the plug on his team.

Shuv it right up them
"Here for a good time not a long time"

User avatar
BiggestNizzy
Posts: 8932
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 6:47 pm
Location: Kilmarnock
Contact:

Post by BiggestNizzy » Fri Sep 14, 2007 12:12 pm

Lawrence wrote: This year Ferrari started the year and won the first race with a flexible floor, they claimed it was alright due to the way the FIA measured the deflection of the floor which is exactly what BAR claimed when they were banned for 2 races with their petrol tank, it was correct the way the FIA measured the cars.
As far as I was aware and I expect to be corrected flexible panels have been banned for jonks I remember looking it up as I came cam up with aan idea of flexible wings that would give high downforce at lower speeds and reduced downforce at high speeds, but someone had though it first and banned it
Sent from my ZX SPECTRUM +2A

User avatar
tut
Barefoot Ninja
Posts: 22975
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 5:53 pm
Location: Tut End, Glen of Newmill

Post by tut » Fri Sep 14, 2007 12:31 pm

Most of you will not remember as I do, Max Mosely's infamous father, Sir Oswald Mosley, former leader of the British Union of Fascists, in the 30's and 40's.

"His second wife Diana, whom he had married in 1936 in the presence of Hitler and Goebbels, was also interned, shortly after the birth of their son Max; they lived together for most of the war in a house in the grounds of Holloway prison."

Some family, but good to see that he is following in his fathers footsteps..........

tut

User avatar
jason
Posts: 2183
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 2:15 pm
Location: East Lothian

Post by jason » Fri Sep 14, 2007 1:09 pm

BiggestNizzy wrote:
Lawrence wrote: This year Ferrari started the year and won the first race with a flexible floor, they claimed it was alright due to the way the FIA measured the deflection of the floor which is exactly what BAR claimed when they were banned for 2 races with their petrol tank, it was correct the way the FIA measured the cars.
As far as I was aware and I expect to be corrected flexible panels have been banned for jonks I remember looking it up as I came cam up with aan idea of flexible wings that would give high downforce at lower speeds and reduced downforce at high speeds, but someone had though it first and banned it
Moveable aero devices and aero devices that act directly on the unsprung wheels (as opposed to the chassis) are banned (orginally due to the dangerous failures of the high strut wings introduced in the 60s).... yet all the teams run aero wishbones too now.

But it's very puzzling how they have not nipped Ferrari's front wheel discs in the bud.

..I think I'd be pleased to see Belestre come back. Mosley has systematically worked against the 'sport' for too long :x

User avatar
BiggestNizzy
Posts: 8932
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 6:47 pm
Location: Kilmarnock
Contact:

Post by BiggestNizzy » Fri Sep 14, 2007 8:12 pm

shooomer wrote:http://www.fia.com/resources/documents/ ... 130907.pdf

not read it but was told to start at para 3.9
Yawn got bored reading.

How did Ferrari find out about these emails ?
Sent from my ZX SPECTRUM +2A

User avatar
Mr Momo
Posts: 2839
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 12:39 am
Location: ABZ

Post by Mr Momo » Fri Sep 14, 2007 8:50 pm

So why no punishment for Alonso ?
Emira - Volvo spec
A1 Black Edition - Ilford HP5 spec

User avatar
BiggestNizzy
Posts: 8932
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 6:47 pm
Location: Kilmarnock
Contact:

Post by BiggestNizzy » Fri Sep 14, 2007 8:59 pm

Mr Momo wrote:So why no punishment for Alonso ?
because they couldn't just punish Alonso and would have to punish hamilton as well, and the UK press would go mental and make the sport even more unpopular.

wait a minute isn't that their aim ? hmmmm
Sent from my ZX SPECTRUM +2A

User avatar
kenny
Posts: 7666
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Bearsden

Post by kenny » Fri Sep 14, 2007 9:05 pm

Image

User avatar
robin
Jedi Master
Posts: 10546
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:39 pm

Post by robin » Sat Sep 15, 2007 9:34 am

They couldn't punish the drivers because they had given them immunity in exchange for revealing any relevant information they had. In other circumstances they would have.

Interesting that Alonso/De La Rosa had something to reveal and Hamilton didn't (or chose not to reveal anything he may have had).

The whole thing smells. I am a McLaren fan, but I must admit that they haven't handled this one well. If they had acted firmly and more swiftly they could perhaps have avoided this one.

It's made worse by the fact that previously Ferrari has been found to be "cheating" and hasn't been punished.

100m$ is a lot of money. As Lawrence observed, it isn't stated where the Formula One Management Limited money that would have been due to McLaren will now go, but my bet is that it will be distributed amongst the remaining teams, either pro-rata with their entitlement, or more likely they'll all just get bumped up the scale, so Ferrari will get P1/P2 money provided they finish P3/P4.

McLaren don't really have the option of withdrawing from the series, but it must be tempting to do so anyway!

Cheers,
Robin
I is in your loomz nibblin ur wirez
#bemoretut

User avatar
Shug
Posts: 13835
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:28 pm
Location: Deepest, Darkest Ayrshire

Post by Shug » Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:01 am

jasonliddell wrote:
BiggestNizzy wrote:
Lawrence wrote: This year Ferrari started the year and won the first race with a flexible floor, they claimed it was alright due to the way the FIA measured the deflection of the floor which is exactly what BAR claimed when they were banned for 2 races with their petrol tank, it was correct the way the FIA measured the cars.
As far as I was aware and I expect to be corrected flexible panels have been banned for jonks I remember looking it up as I came cam up with aan idea of flexible wings that would give high downforce at lower speeds and reduced downforce at high speeds, but someone had though it first and banned it
Moveable aero devices and aero devices that act directly on the unsprung wheels (as opposed to the chassis) are banned (orginally due to the dangerous failures of the high strut wings introduced in the 60s).... yet all the teams run aero wishbones too now.

But it's very puzzling how they have not nipped Ferrari's front wheel discs in the bud.

..I think I'd be pleased to see Belestre come back. Mosley has systematically worked against the 'sport' for too long :x
Movable aero is still there - wings flex under load but there are pretty strict tolerances for it. Wishbones must be aerodynamically neutral, apart from a little bit on the inboard end of the rears IIRC, which falls outside the regulated wishbone area.

Giorgio Piola does fantastic books that detail all the wee features on the cars after each season. Beautifully illustrated (he's the guy that does the illustrations in Autosport for F1 stuff) they are worth getting just as coffee table books, but they are full of 'ah, so that's what it's for' moments too :thumbsup
2010 Honda VFR1200F
1990 Honda VFR400 NC30
2000 Honda VTR1000 SP1
2000 Kawasaki ZX-7R

User avatar
albutch
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 2:44 am
Location: Lairg

Post by albutch » Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:10 am

tut wrote:Most of you will not remember as I do, Max Mosely's infamous father, Sir Oswald Mosley, former leader of the British Union of Fascists, in the 30's and 40's.

"His second wife Diana, whom he had married in 1936 in the presence of Hitler and Goebbels, was also interned, shortly after the birth of their son Max; they lived together for most of the war in a house in the grounds of Holloway prison."

Some family, but good to see that he is following in his fathers footsteps..........

tut
Just what I was thinking too, tut.

Mosley was the leader of the British Blackshirts who were kind of modelled on the Italian Blackshirts, Mussolini's fascist henchmen. :?

User avatar
jason
Posts: 2183
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 2:15 pm
Location: East Lothian

Post by jason » Sat Sep 15, 2007 5:12 pm

Shug wrote:
jasonliddell wrote:
BiggestNizzy wrote: As far as I was aware and I expect to be corrected flexible panels have been banned for jonks I remember looking it up as I came cam up with aan idea of flexible wings that would give high downforce at lower speeds and reduced downforce at high speeds, but someone had though it first and banned it
Moveable aero devices and aero devices that act directly on the unsprung wheels (as opposed to the chassis) are banned (orginally due to the dangerous failures of the high strut wings introduced in the 60s).... yet all the teams run aero wishbones too now.

But it's very puzzling how they have not nipped Ferrari's front wheel discs in the bud.

..I think I'd be pleased to see Belestre come back. Mosley has systematically worked against the 'sport' for too long :x
Movable aero is still there - wings flex under load but there are pretty strict tolerances for it. Wishbones must be aerodynamically neutral, apart from a little bit on the inboard end of the rears IIRC, which falls outside the regulated wishbone area.

Giorgio Piola does fantastic books that detail all the wee features on the cars after each season. Beautifully illustrated (he's the guy that does the illustrations in Autosport for F1 stuff) they are worth getting just as coffee table books, but they are full of 'ah, so that's what it's for' moments too :thumbsup
Yep. I'm a big fan of Piola's drawings... great skills - and enhanced with Gary Anderson's comments these days too. Didn't know there was a dedicated book of his drawings - got a link? :)

But IMHO the grey area with the wishbones is that they're not quite 'aero neutral' in the purist sense... they condition - and, crucially, *redicrect* - the airflow specifically to help other bodywork generate downforce - especially when they've been shruded in further bodywork.

but then it's a grey area I guess :roll: .... so I'll shut up :lol:

User avatar
gorrie
Posts: 2821
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 5:40 pm
Location: West Lothian

Post by gorrie » Sun Sep 16, 2007 9:56 am

From F1.com:-

++++++++++++++
FIA President Max Mosley has revealed how Formula One racing’s governing body plans to spend the proceeds from McLaren’s record $100 million fine.

If Mosley has his way, McLaren’s rivals will receive a portion of the money, with the rest distributed among national motorsport authorities to help fund young driver programmes.

“Roughly half of it will go to the other teams, the other half we’re going - if the World Council agrees - to distribute to our ASNs worldwide to bring on young drivers,â€
I have no signature.

Post Reply