Same size wheels

The place to "speak geek"
Post Reply
User avatar
hiscot
Posts: 757
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 8:56 am
Location: North Scotland

Same size wheels

Post by hiscot » Mon Apr 23, 2007 4:59 pm

Anyone running same size wheels front and rear ie 15 or 16 ect
any reason why not , any advantages / disadvantages

User avatar
Lazydonkey
Posts: 5139
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 6:24 pm
Location: Glasgow
Contact:

Post by Lazydonkey » Mon Apr 23, 2007 5:33 pm

All VX's have 17" all round, as do the new Europas.

Only disadvantages I can see is that the fronts are a darn site heavier than ideal and you can't get many 175/45 17" tyres to fit. Well there is only one to be honest.

I'm sure someone who knows something about some things will be along soon.......... :oops:
Focus ST estate, i3s and more pushbikes than strictly necessary.

....did i ever tell you about the Evora and VX220 i used to own?

User avatar
r10crw
Posts: 1966
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 8:14 pm
Location: Aberdeenshire

Post by r10crw » Tue Apr 24, 2007 7:50 am

Bob, It recommends in the manual that you put 15s (S1) on the back in snow which makes sense but as for the front on to 16s I cant see any advantage. Cheers Craig.

User avatar
tuscan_thunder
Posts: 1189
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:33 pm
Location: Aberdeenshire

Post by tuscan_thunder » Tue Apr 24, 2007 2:02 pm

I would think 16s on the front would limit suspension travel and stop you being able to run it so low?
Mair throttle, less brake

User avatar
Shug
Posts: 13835
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:28 pm
Location: Deepest, Darkest Ayrshire

Post by Shug » Tue Apr 24, 2007 4:12 pm

In design terms, the 15/16 thing was purely for styling. The engineering bods nearly had it on 13s at one point! (unsprung weight reduction)
2010 Honda VFR1200F
1990 Honda VFR400 NC30
2000 Honda VTR1000 SP1
2000 Kawasaki ZX-7R

User avatar
tuscan_thunder
Posts: 1189
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:33 pm
Location: Aberdeenshire

Post by tuscan_thunder » Tue Apr 24, 2007 4:15 pm

..which is partly the reason why my hillclimb saxo will be sticking with 14inch wheels - lighter, car can be lower to the ground without hitting bump stops, lower gearing, cheaper tyres. win win win win situation!
Mair throttle, less brake

User avatar
hiscot
Posts: 757
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 8:56 am
Location: North Scotland

Post by hiscot » Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm

tuscan_thunder wrote:..which is partly the reason why my hillclimb saxo will be sticking with 14inch wheels - lighter, car can be lower to the ground without hitting bump stops, lower gearing, cheaper tyres. win win win win situation!
caterham use small wheels , i understud it was because of the gyro effect a spinning wheel has

but wondered if for track use why not 15" all around ?

also heard fitting 15/16 after marketwheels to a S2 transforms it ie better gearing but have read they also corner better , dont know if its true

yet s1 exige has the larger wheels

User avatar
Shug
Posts: 13835
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:28 pm
Location: Deepest, Darkest Ayrshire

Post by Shug » Wed Apr 25, 2007 9:51 am

It's always a trade-off.

Larger wheels give you more space for big brakes (and fill the arches on the Exige, which was developed from the Motorsport racers, which did have bigger brakes to accomodate) They also let you use short sidewalls, making the tyre contact patch more stable and taking out some of the undamped suspension factor of the tyre.

Smaller wheels give you less unsprung weight & less weight overall. As they are on the 'wrong' end of the suspension, extra weight there means that you have less control using the suspension as the mass of the wheel/tyre combo has to be controlled.

F1 tyres are 13" with mahoosive sidewalls purely because the rules state you need a 13" max rim. Keeps brake sizes down. Side effect is that as much as 50% of the suspension movement in a current F1 car is down to the tyre sidewalls.
2010 Honda VFR1200F
1990 Honda VFR400 NC30
2000 Honda VTR1000 SP1
2000 Kawasaki ZX-7R

User avatar
Shug
Posts: 13835
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:28 pm
Location: Deepest, Darkest Ayrshire

Post by Shug » Wed Apr 25, 2007 9:53 am

Oh, and using a 15" rear wouldn't really work on the elise, as the suspension geometry is set up for a 16" rim (and relatively large sidewall) to get the correct ride heights. Raising the suspension to compensate would throw out the dynamic camber and bump steer etc...
2010 Honda VFR1200F
1990 Honda VFR400 NC30
2000 Honda VTR1000 SP1
2000 Kawasaki ZX-7R

User avatar
Rich H
Posts: 9314
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:11 pm
Location: Preston

Post by Rich H » Wed Apr 25, 2007 9:57 am

I'm suprised that smaller wheels save much weight, but that's because I haven't thought about it until I started typing this. I've answered my own query now.

Move along nothing to read here.....

(I've just realised that bigger wheel = lots more rim and a little more wheel face. The weight of the extra rubber in the sidewall is minimal in comparison to an extra few inches of rim)

Who will be the first running 13" mini-lites and carbon-ceramic brakes then?
1994 Lotus Esprit S4 - Work in progress
1980 Porsche 924 Turbo - Funky Interior Spec
2004 Smart Roadster Coupe - Hers

User avatar
Tom
Posts: 3220
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 5:50 pm
Location: UK

Post by Tom » Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:35 am

i asked my lecturer this question, and he went away and found an answer. it's something along the lines of it has an effect on the suspension geometry which helps the elise sustain around 1G of lateral grip, something which i gather is helped by having smaller wheels on the front.

HTH
1995 Volvo 940SE Estate

Post Reply