lotus and LSDs

The place to "speak geek"
istoo
Posts: 725
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2014 8:52 pm

lotus and LSDs

Post by istoo » Mon Mar 07, 2016 7:35 pm

I have done a search and not found and answer that sums it up.. but often wondered this, why have lotus never fitted / installed LSDs to cars until very recently?
S2 111s

User avatar
robin
Jedi Master
Posts: 10546
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:39 pm

Re: lotus and LSDs

Post by robin » Mon Mar 07, 2016 9:20 pm

I think in the days of the K it really wasn't worth it. With sticky tyres and little to no torque there wasn't really a need for LSD - there wasn't much S to L ;-)

With big superchargers and engine capacity the torque has become more problematic to deal with ... diesel, anybody? ... and so an LSD perhaps makes more sense to get mechanical drive out of the corners? But I must confess I have no idea!
I is in your loomz nibblin ur wirez
#bemoretut

User avatar
mckeann
Posts: 5370
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 9:20 am
Location: Bo'ness

Re: lotus and LSDs

Post by mckeann » Mon Mar 07, 2016 9:49 pm

Simon Scuffham will tell you that it causes understeer, and it only tries to mask the problem of too much roll, so better to just fix the problem of roll rather than try to mask it with an LSD.

I don't know myself, but I'd be inclined to agree with him.

User avatar
Dominic
Posts: 14446
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 10:14 am
Location: Milton Of Campsie
Contact:

Re: lotus and LSDs

Post by Dominic » Mon Mar 07, 2016 9:54 pm

On older elises I don't think they are needed,
https://youtu.be/PlMc-EKZvyw

On newer lotuses I think IIRC that the traction control acts like a virtual lsd.
http://www.dsaccountancy.com

1999 Lotus Elise Sport 135'99

pete
Vexatious Litigant
Posts: 4706
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 3:23 pm
Location: Kilmarnock

Re: lotus and LSDs

Post by pete » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:07 pm

robin wrote:I think in the days of the K it really wasn't worth it. With sticky tyres and little to no torque there wasn't really a need for LSD - there wasn't much S to L ;-)
What do you mean "in the days of the K". That's today!
'99 - '03 Titanium S1 111S.
'03 - '10 Starlight Black S2 111S
'11 - '17 S2 135R
'17 - '19 S2 Exige S+
'23 - ?? Evora

Rosssco
Posts: 656
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 9:19 pm
Location: Aberdeen

Re: lotus and LSDs

Post by Rosssco » Mon Mar 07, 2016 11:25 pm

Are LSD's essentially a sop to optimal suspension design though? With the suspension correct set up on a road car, the suspension should keep the inside wheel in contact with the ground sufficient to prevent it spinning up.

On the road, with 220lb/ft but decent road suspension (Exige Bilsteins) I've never really found the need for an LSD, except perhaps trying to gun it out a really tight bend. At which point an LSD would probably spit me off the road!
VX220 SC
M135i
Parajet V3 Moster 185

User avatar
Victor Meldrew
Posts: 5723
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 1:01 pm
Location: Unable to use location services. Please turn on your wifi....

Re: lotus and LSDs

Post by Victor Meldrew » Tue Mar 08, 2016 7:40 am

When I drove Mikes S1 at Boyndie I said to him at the time that I thought his car was reluctant to turn in off the throttle. It was totally different to mine. Could have been a number of things but the only fundamental difference between both our cars other than power was Mike's had an LSD fitted.
Well it moves... might as well make the most of it....

User avatar
robin
Jedi Master
Posts: 10546
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:39 pm

Re: lotus and LSDs

Post by robin » Tue Mar 08, 2016 8:33 am

Nobody should need LSD on the road.

The question is whether it is needed on track.

Traction control can produce a virtual LSD only if it is the kind that can apply brakes independently per wheel as opposed to limiting engine output.

The Elise has no rear anti roll bar (unless really new ones do?). So you can only really prevent traction loss due to roll using the front arb and strong springs and lots of droop travel at the rear.

You would need to ask someone who has experience of racing modern Elises with lots of power whether the LSD would help.

Cheers,
Robin
I is in your loomz nibblin ur wirez
#bemoretut

User avatar
Shug
Posts: 13835
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:28 pm
Location: Deepest, Darkest Ayrshire

Re: lotus and LSDs

Post by Shug » Tue Mar 08, 2016 10:09 am

I had an interesting experiment with my old Elise. Fitted a torsen diff when I built up a gearbox out of a few different ones. I had an open diff ready to go back in if I didn't like it, but actually for the track driving I was doing, it was better fun.

My Elise always needed more roll control - had uprated suspension, but road/track rates, and no uprated anti roll bar. Photos showed it rolled too much on track. So, for mine, it was great - actually helped turn in (I think largely by over-rotating the rear) and made it much more throttle adjustable on corner exit - could hold better slides more easily. Now, would it be faster? That, I don't know as I never timed laps or videoed many to compare. But in my case, a combination of factors made a torsen a positive addition to the car.

On road, it was a different story - with the Elise being more traction limited at the front (pretty rearward biased weight), it would dart about on power if the rears were on different surfaces or different cambers - in other words, pretty much all the time on the patchwork quilt that is the Scottish road network :D Made it less composed on the road - combined of course with the fact that I was running reasonably pointy geo at that stage.

Interesting that McLaren's P1 - which chucks an awful lot of torque and horsepower through the rear tyres - doesn't have a mechanical LSD. It does work the rear brakes, as Robin talks about, though.

I think the view is probably right, that if the car is set up well, there's no need for an LSD on the Elise unless you're chucking out an awful lot of torque and using it as a track car -mostly because of that light front end and the diff dominating proceedings on the road if you're not careful.
2010 Honda VFR1200F
1990 Honda VFR400 NC30
2000 Honda VTR1000 SP1
2000 Kawasaki ZX-7R

istoo
Posts: 725
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2014 8:52 pm

Re: lotus and LSDs

Post by istoo » Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:17 pm

now that does have some explainable logic, combination of CoG, lightweight and low torque does make sense. On that basis do Caterfields use LSDs?

Mine doesnt have enough torque (VVC) to set it alight at KH, unless i really force it out of shape at the hairpin it will step off the AD07s, otherwise only trail braking seems to let the back step out... the M3 was so playable on throttle. The elise, not that turn in was ever bad in the first place... just curious!

Does weight have anything to do with it?
S2 111s

User avatar
Shug
Posts: 13835
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:28 pm
Location: Deepest, Darkest Ayrshire

Re: lotus and LSDs

Post by Shug » Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:04 pm

Caterfields have all their weight over the front axle (yeah, I know it's a bit more balanced than that) where the Elise has the engine sitting pretty much directly over the rear wheels. So yeah, quick Caterfields do tend to use LSDs as their weight isn't over the driven wheels so the dynamics are different.
2010 Honda VFR1200F
1990 Honda VFR400 NC30
2000 Honda VTR1000 SP1
2000 Kawasaki ZX-7R

User avatar
van cleef
Posts: 160
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2014 8:04 am
Location: Inverurie

Re: lotus and LSDs

Post by van cleef » Tue Mar 08, 2016 7:15 pm

Isn't the gearbox from a BRM rover be a straight swop with a Torsen LSD as standard? I was searching for one to try out on my vvc but, never could find one when I was looking.

User avatar
Mike Scib
Posts: 2995
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 5:04 pm

Re: lotus and LSDs

Post by Mike Scib » Tue Mar 08, 2016 7:21 pm

Is the issue with fitting a LSD to the Elise not that it can cause understeer in slower speed corners as the front end is pretty light?

I have never felt my car requires a LSD even with 260bhp :thumbsup

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDf9YEnIUFQ

Jump to 8.20.
alicrozier wrote:As Robin said, need to be comfortable and confident to push right up to the limit - sometimes you only find the limit by going beyond it...
(that's why I think Mike will do fine, that and his lack of imagination). :roll: :lol:

User avatar
j2 lot
Posts: 7660
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:47 pm
Location: Strathaven / Glasgow

Re: lotus and LSDs

Post by j2 lot » Wed Mar 09, 2016 12:21 am

My only experience of an LSD was many years ago in a rally mini - it was a nightmare to drive as it seemed to randomly leap about the road - think bucking bronco. I couldn't drive it to save my life, the owner who was used to it could make it perform seemingly impossible turns with almost no loss of speed. You needed muscles like Popeye and an understanding of what it was trying to do to make it work - I had neither :roll:
2015 Lotus Evora
2022 Polestar 2 LRSM Plus
2023 Skoda Kodiaq Sportline

User avatar
Shug
Posts: 13835
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:28 pm
Location: Deepest, Darkest Ayrshire

Re: lotus and LSDs

Post by Shug » Wed Mar 09, 2016 12:22 pm

van cleef wrote:Isn't the gearbox from a BRM rover be a straight swop with a Torsen LSD as standard? I was searching for one to try out on my vvc but, never could find one when I was looking.
Yup - but the final drive was wrong. I built up a BRM box with the standard final drive, giving a decent close ratio box. Can't remember the ratios off the top of my head, but just chucking the BRM box in would have given funky results - either far too high or low overall. Ideal with the CR gear cluster in it and the standard final drive.
2010 Honda VFR1200F
1990 Honda VFR400 NC30
2000 Honda VTR1000 SP1
2000 Kawasaki ZX-7R

Post Reply