Page 1 of 1
Mot Fail : Emissions yet again
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 1:14 pm
by tenkfeet
All is fine accept for the lambda reading limit 0.970-1.030 actual value was 1.179 .
Am I right in thinking first place to look is the flexi pipe in the exhaust ?
Co was 0.00% (limit is o.20ppm)
HC was 15ppm (limit 200ppm )
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 1:18 pm
by GregR
yup
you do have a cat on don't you....?
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 1:26 pm
by tenkfeet
GregR wrote:yup
you do have a cat on don't you....?
Thats what the MOT tester asked. It only has had a Lotus sports exhaust fitted my understanding being it still has the cat.
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 1:29 pm
by GregR
double check mate - it might have one of those silenced de-cat pipe jobbies on it. A cat is easy to spot with the tray off, so I'd say have a butchers before you go down the new flexi route.
If required, there's 2 flexis going at the mo on SELC*CK for not too high a price.
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 2:00 pm
by tenkfeet
GregR wrote:double check mate - it might have one of those silenced de-cat pipe jobbies on it. A cat is easy to spot with the tray off, so I'd say have a butchers before you go down the new flexi route.
If required, there's 2 flexis going at the mo on SELC*CK for not too high a price.
Trays are off and it has a cat . I cannot feel any blowing around the flexi section .My car has only done 12k miles all be it backwards on numerous occasions . Good spot for the Seloc exhaust cheers .
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 2:06 pm
by Stephen
Greg,
Do you still have my cat?
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:27 pm
by GregR
Stephen wrote:Greg,
Do you still have my cat?
Sh!t Stephen - I completely forgot about that!! Yes I do still have your cat, and its still fitted on the car
I'll need to get it up on a ramp to get it off and get mine back in pronto!
Sorry about that mate

Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:27 pm
by tenkfeet
I have taken the flexi pipe off and it looks ok bar some discolouration on the top . I filled it with water and there appear to be no leaks ( Not scientific I know ) I suppose it could still leak when heated and under pressure .
Anybody got any suggestions , could the sensors be duff? Or should I just bite the bullet and change the flexi .
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:33 pm
by mac
Tenk - If your getting that Lamda reading then I would suspect your post cat one has failed (they only have a 3 or 4 year life span).
Change that and get it re-tested - if it still fails either change the pre-cat one.
HTH
Mac
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:46 pm
by Stephen
no problem, It's just that it's coming to winter and the spiders need a home

Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:27 pm
by tenkfeet
mac wrote:Tenk - If your getting that Lamda reading then I would suspect your post cat one has failed (they only have a 3 or 4 year life span).
Change that and get it re-tested - if it still fails either change the pre-cat one.
HTH
Mac
Cool I will give that a go as the exhaust appears ok .
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 10:40 pm
by robin
tenkfeet wrote:mac wrote:Tenk - If your getting that Lamda reading then I would suspect your post cat one has failed (they only have a 3 or 4 year life span).
Change that and get it re-tested - if it still fails either change the pre-cat one.
HTH
Mac
Cool I will give that a go as the exhaust appears ok .
Testing the upstream lambda is easy enough with a multi-meter - once it's heated up and with car running you should see an alternating voltage flipping back and forth between near zero and around 1V once a second on two of the wires; the thinner ones; the thick ones are heater wires.
I imagine the same will apply to the post-cat one, except maybe you'll need to blip full throttle to make it pump a load of fuel in to cause that one to toggle?
Anyone actually had experience with testing downstream lambda?
Cheers,
Robin
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:00 am
by tenkfeet
Found this on Seloc Wicki for testing o2 sensors.
http://wiki.seloc.org/index.php/Lambda_sensor
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 2:14 pm
by tenkfeet
Mac I owe you a couple of beers . Cheers .
I replaced the Post sensor and it has just passed its MOT . They did come to say that it was going to fail then it came good by 0.02 . I think the pre one maybe dodgy but that can wait till next year .
I tested the sensors with a heat gun and multimeter the post sensor would only put out 0.07 volts solid the pre one was 0.7 volts and jumped about as it should .
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 2:55 pm
by mac
Portugese MoFo's - just make mine with that pear ciders stuff this time
Mac