Pagid RS-42's
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:36 pm
Folks,
I recently had a set of Pagid RS-42's break up on me, they were 2-3k old and hadn't been subject to any wheel cleaner. There also seemed to be plenty of "meat" left in them
....as such I returned them to the supplier/manufacturer who gave this reply....
Supplier response :
"Thanks for returning the E1587 RS4-2 with the comments that the pad material is breaking up! A quick visual inspection shows a 1 pad displays surface cracking which is visual rather than functional.
Firstly I measured the thickness of the pads, this varied on all 4 pads, between 9.1mm and 10.4mm. The recommended minimum thickness that PAGID recommend is 4mm of friction material remaining on the pad, and when the backing plate thickness is also included, which in this case is 5.1mm this gives a minimum thickness of 9.1mm. So the pads are worn to the limit, which in itself creates less mass to dissipate the thermal energy generated during braking, so the pad material runs hotter the thinner it gets. While I don’t think that is the only cause of the problem, it does contribute to the problem.
Another cause of surface fractures is rapid rises and falls of temperature which creates thermal shock resulting in small surface cracks that get progressively worse, this is a common phenomena during race and circuit use, and can also be seen during extreme road use. For this purpose PAGID use an exclusive mechanical attachment method to prevent de-lamination from the backing plate, so surface cracks do appear, but don’t present a problem.
The next most popular cause of pad material corrosion and ultimately surface cracking is the use of corrosive wheel cleaner which penetrates the friction material and can cause cracks and crumbling of the binders that hold the friction material together.
So, probably a combination of 2 of the above criteria.
Hope this goes some way to explaining what is likely to have occurred here, but does in no way present a problem in wither performance or safety, as there are measures in place to prevent de-lamination if operating conditions create such issues."
FYI
BTW this isn't a complaint re the supplier or manufacturer, but I certainly wasn't aware of it!
I recently had a set of Pagid RS-42's break up on me, they were 2-3k old and hadn't been subject to any wheel cleaner. There also seemed to be plenty of "meat" left in them
....as such I returned them to the supplier/manufacturer who gave this reply....
Supplier response :
"Thanks for returning the E1587 RS4-2 with the comments that the pad material is breaking up! A quick visual inspection shows a 1 pad displays surface cracking which is visual rather than functional.
Firstly I measured the thickness of the pads, this varied on all 4 pads, between 9.1mm and 10.4mm. The recommended minimum thickness that PAGID recommend is 4mm of friction material remaining on the pad, and when the backing plate thickness is also included, which in this case is 5.1mm this gives a minimum thickness of 9.1mm. So the pads are worn to the limit, which in itself creates less mass to dissipate the thermal energy generated during braking, so the pad material runs hotter the thinner it gets. While I don’t think that is the only cause of the problem, it does contribute to the problem.
Another cause of surface fractures is rapid rises and falls of temperature which creates thermal shock resulting in small surface cracks that get progressively worse, this is a common phenomena during race and circuit use, and can also be seen during extreme road use. For this purpose PAGID use an exclusive mechanical attachment method to prevent de-lamination from the backing plate, so surface cracks do appear, but don’t present a problem.
The next most popular cause of pad material corrosion and ultimately surface cracking is the use of corrosive wheel cleaner which penetrates the friction material and can cause cracks and crumbling of the binders that hold the friction material together.
So, probably a combination of 2 of the above criteria.
Hope this goes some way to explaining what is likely to have occurred here, but does in no way present a problem in wither performance or safety, as there are measures in place to prevent de-lamination if operating conditions create such issues."
FYI
BTW this isn't a complaint re the supplier or manufacturer, but I certainly wasn't aware of it!