Honda Elise -Not again I hear you cry

Anything goes in here.....
tenkfeet
Posts: 2338
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:02 pm
Location: Glasgow

Honda Elise -Not again I hear you cry

Post by tenkfeet » Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:41 am

This subject has been done to death I know but I am having a bit of a dilema.

I see from seloc http://forums.seloc.org/viewthread.php?tid=105132 that Eliseparts are now producing the Link up Honda Elise kit and have started up a site . Jude performance is only just down the road .

So the subject of putting a Honda in my Elise has come up again and I am seriously tempted but I am trying to convince why I should not do it . Seriously like to know you guys detatched rational opinions .

My ability driving a K series Elise is not that great and I have massive room for improvement but I would seriously like the extra overtaking power . I had a Civic type R and the engine and Gearbox were amazing and I seriously miss it

Questions I am asking myself .
1. Its a lots of cash and I need a new kitchen :oops:
2. Should I spend the money on driver training and track days instead ?
3. How much is a 12k miles K series engine and gearbox worth ?
4. Insurance will be more.
5. Does it make much difference in the twistys?
6. Am I reponsible enough ? :lol:

Has anybody had a reliable conversion done and regretted it ?
No lotus
Exige Sport 350 (Sold)
Elise Cup 250 (Air con and radio tubby spec) (Sold)
Evora S (sold)

User avatar
Stu160
Posts: 2807
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 8:20 pm

Post by Stu160 » Mon Jan 15, 2007 1:08 am

I would go for option 2,if you get more power,and cant use it properly,(no disrespect) it could make you slower?
You already have 150+bhp with the VVC ,in the dry ,I would say the car could do 63 sec laps at KH(or less,not that you would time your laps on a track day,as it is against the rules :lol: ),if you are way off that ,more power is the last thing you need.

Just my opinion,go for the kitchen.

Stu

tenkfeet
Posts: 2338
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:02 pm
Location: Glasgow

Post by tenkfeet » Mon Jan 15, 2007 1:23 am

Stu160 wrote:I would go for option 2,if you get more power,and cant use it properly,(no disrespect) it could make you slower?
You already have 150+bhp with the VVC ,in the dry ,I would say the car could do 63 sec laps at KH(or less,not that you would time your laps on a track day,as it is against the rules :lol: ),if you are way off that ,more power is the last thing you need.

Just my opinion,go for the kitchen.

Stu
I had not thought about it making me slower, valid point . I have never timed myself on track , laps are very inconsistent and thats when I stay on the black stuff :oops:

I cannot get excited about a kitchen . It would add value to my house I suppose which would pay for the new engine :lol:
No lotus
Exige Sport 350 (Sold)
Elise Cup 250 (Air con and radio tubby spec) (Sold)
Evora S (sold)

User avatar
robin
Jedi Master
Posts: 10546
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:39 pm

Post by robin » Mon Jan 15, 2007 9:05 am

Your engine and gearbox would be worth no more than 750 IMHO. The S2 VVC has the funny gearing, but the engine is a nice 150-odd BHP, so I think as a low miler it will sell for around that, maybe a wee bit more.

Your power to weight ratio wouldn't go up by *that* much over the VVC - nothing that will make much of a difference when overtaking traffic (put another way, the overtakes that you could complete with the Honda but not with the VVC are probably too borderline to be safe anyway).

If your goal is to enjoy the car more, spend some time and money on improving yourself as a driver - there is so much to be gotten from these cars - I also agree with Stu that it could make you slower.

Finally, I think the Honda doesn't sit well in an S2 with standard front wheels - you will understeer out of every corner unless you are very good at throttle control :-)

2p

Robin
I is in your loomz nibblin ur wirez
#bemoretut

User avatar
mac
Posts: 6880
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:36 pm

Post by mac » Mon Jan 15, 2007 9:08 am

Bearing in mind I've driven with you I think that if you upgrade the elise to honda power at the moment the next thing you'll be in will be powered by ford and have a lovely, long, mahogany parcel shelf :wink:

Get some driving training first :D

Mac

User avatar
roadboy
Posts: 1599
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 11:51 pm
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Contact:

Post by roadboy » Mon Jan 15, 2007 9:57 am

robin wrote:Your power to weight ratio wouldn't go up by *that* much over the VVC - nothing that will make much of a difference when overtaking traffic
Have you driven one Robin? I used to think like that until I actually converted my car.

Anyone is welcome to come down and have a test drive. I am pretty sure you'll change your mind.

I don't think the Honda would actually make anyone slower as the power delivery is so linear.

/2p :wink:

Dan@JPS
SPS Automotive
Independent Lotus Specialists
http://www.spsautomotive.co.uk

User avatar
ed
Posts: 9678
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 12:33 pm

Post by ed » Mon Jan 15, 2007 10:12 am

Stu160 wrote:I would go for option 2,if you get more power,and cant use it properly,(no disrespect) it could make you slower?
You already have 150+bhp with the VVC ,in the dry ,I would say the car could do 63 sec laps at KH(or less,not that you would time your laps on a track day,as it is against the rules :lol: ),if you are way off that ,more power is the last thing you need.

Just my opinion,go for the kitchen.

Stu
What he said! I believe there is very little difference between a honda car and vvc through the twisties if drivers are of similar standard. If i were you i would maybe upgrade the suspension, wheels & tyres and get some training and more trackdays in. Then when you have got the most out of it you could then think about Honda! :twisted: All imho! cheers Ed :D
Octopus Energy Referral Code (£50 each!) share.octopus.energy/light-lynx-588

jj
Posts: 4887
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:30 pm
Location: Glasgow

Post by jj » Mon Jan 15, 2007 10:21 am

I can design+sell you a top-spec kitchen that will make you cook faster. :D

User avatar
ed
Posts: 9678
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 12:33 pm

Post by ed » Mon Jan 15, 2007 10:21 am

roadboy wrote: Anyone is welcome to come down and have a test drive. I am pretty sure you'll change your mind.


Dan@JPS
I might take you up on that! 8)
ps fancy bringing her up to KH for some demo laps?! :wink:
Octopus Energy Referral Code (£50 each!) share.octopus.energy/light-lynx-588

User avatar
ed
Posts: 9678
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 12:33 pm

Post by ed » Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:03 am

Just had a look at the new site. http://www.hondaelise.com. Looks good!

Anyone any ideas why the link-up kit is £1k more than the sincs kit and how can they claim more power and torque with stock engines?! :? I thought they were all the same?!
Octopus Energy Referral Code (£50 each!) share.octopus.energy/light-lynx-588

User avatar
Rich H
Posts: 9314
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 10:11 pm
Location: Preston

Post by Rich H » Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:10 am

IIRC there are different stock engines, JDM (Jap Domestic Market) engines are more powerful standard.

May be talking utter sh*t though...
1994 Lotus Esprit S4 - Work in progress
1980 Porsche 924 Turbo - Funky Interior Spec
2004 Smart Roadster Coupe - Hers

Gareth
Posts: 4959
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 12:19 pm
Location: The Moon

Post by Gareth » Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:24 am

JDM's are more powerful.
My opinion doesn't usually mean much but....

If you want a Honda...get one.
Do whatever makes you happy.
If you think by putting in a Honda will make you faster on track....unless it's on a straight...you wont be any quicker until your driving improves (You only have to look at McKeann..... :D ).

Infact, if you want to go quicker...look at what Simon A has done.
Improved brakes, suspension, fitted OZ's and 48s and he's dramatically got quicker.
Last edited by Gareth on Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:27 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Shug
Posts: 13835
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:28 pm
Location: Deepest, Darkest Ayrshire

Post by Shug » Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:25 am

RICHARDHUMBLE wrote:IIRC there are different stock engines, JDM (Jap Domestic Market) engines are more powerful standard.

May be talking utter sh*t though...
I think it's more to do with Scuffham's ECU and exhaust tuning. Both kits use EU engines as standard AFAIK.

I'm not saying that Sincs haven't done as well with that, I'm not privvy to the tests - maybe link-up's kits are better at releasing the power, maybe sincs claim more realistic figures. Either or, from what I've seen, they are both well-engineered kits.
2010 Honda VFR1200F
1990 Honda VFR400 NC30
2000 Honda VTR1000 SP1
2000 Kawasaki ZX-7R

User avatar
Shug
Posts: 13835
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:28 pm
Location: Deepest, Darkest Ayrshire

Post by Shug » Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:27 am

Gareth wrote: If you want a Honda...get one.
Do whatever makes you happy.
If you think by putting in a Honda will make you faster on track....unless it's on a straight...you wont be any quicker until your driving improves (You only have to look at McKeann..... :D ).
See, now I'm worried - I agree here. If you wanna go fater on track, then get training. If you want a honda for it's own sake, go for it. :)
2010 Honda VFR1200F
1990 Honda VFR400 NC30
2000 Honda VTR1000 SP1
2000 Kawasaki ZX-7R

User avatar
Shug
Posts: 13835
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:28 pm
Location: Deepest, Darkest Ayrshire

Post by Shug » Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:28 am

robin wrote: Your power to weight ratio wouldn't go up by *that* much over the VVC
Twoo - but the gear ratios (and extra cog) would make it a different league of quick. Steve Butts posted up a series of cascade curves somewhere showing the way that the Honda uses the ratio to keep in the meat of the torque curve everywhere.
2010 Honda VFR1200F
1990 Honda VFR400 NC30
2000 Honda VTR1000 SP1
2000 Kawasaki ZX-7R

Post Reply