Anything goes in here.....
-
C7Steve
- Posts: 4518
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 2:00 pm
- Location: Aberdeen
Post
by C7Steve » Tue Aug 04, 2015 8:28 pm
-
Dominic
- Posts: 14447
- Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 10:14 am
- Location: Milton Of Campsie
-
Contact:
Post
by Dominic » Wed Aug 05, 2015 9:16 am
Wow! That is mega quick, but at only a capacity of 20 passengers, it will be mega pricey too. Can't help but think that there must be a better balance of speed / capacity - i.e., 2 hour flight, but able to take maybe 60 peeps?
Great to see something being developed as a replacement for Concorde

-
GregR
- Posts: 6933
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 1:45 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
Post
by GregR » Wed Aug 05, 2015 11:46 am
Dominic wrote:Wow! That is mega quick, but at only a capacity of 20 passengers, it will be mega pricey too. Can't help but think that there must be a better balance of speed / capacity - i.e., 2 hour flight, but able to take maybe 60 peeps?
Great to see something being developed as a replacement for Concorde

It's called a 747 and it all but killed Concorde before the accidents
Ferrari 458
Porsche 993 C2
Disco V
-
campbell
- Posts: 17339
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 12:42 pm
- Location: West Lothian
-
Contact:
Post
by campbell » Wed Aug 05, 2015 11:57 am
I read somewhere that smaller jets are threatening the 380 Superjumbo already. They are able to fly longer-haul, yet don't need mega runways / facilities etc.
Viz the growth in faraway destinations from Edinburgh Airport.
-
woody
- Posts: 5637
- Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 4:03 pm
- Location: Southside Triangle
Post
by woody » Wed Aug 05, 2015 3:48 pm
Campbell, see 787/dreamliner & Airbus's A350 response to it.
All Airbus have done as far add I can see is register a design or idea, there's nothing at all to say they've any intention of building it.