Scottish Elises

Interesting.. He also takes a robust approach in the comments section...

http://jalopnik.com/how-money-is-not-ma ... 1679747807

Some very valid points.

Typically yank replies, on the whole....

Let's watch the generalisations, shall we?

To be honest, Chris Harris doesn't really interest me - whenever I've watched the odd video linked from here I've not found his journalism to be engaging - of course it's horses for courses and there is no denying he reviews some great cars, so I can see the interest is there.

I don't understand the finer details of what he's writing about in that article as I've never been a consumer of automotive journalism and clearly there is some youtube/drive (whatever that is)/jalopnik(ditto) politics I don't get.

If the premise is "it's hard to make money out of being a freelance automotive journalist" then my response would probably be "do something else"

Cheers,
Robin

The world is changing and he liked it the way it was

Doesn't paint him in the best light. He seems very bitter.

Why is it that people like stampycat can make a good living on YouTube and he can't? I assumed it all came through the advertising which is the same as print surely? And without actually having to print mags or dvd's.

robin wrote:Let's watch the generalisations, shall we?

Shouldn't that be in blue?

Chris Harris' main problem is a simple one.

Chris Harris.

I cannot stand the man, not sure why, possibly a mix of his attitude, delivery, mannerisms and an overwhelming auora of trying way too hard to be liked.

I have tried to watch his videos, I really have, but I just can't. I always end up either turning it off, muting it or scanning through to the outside shots of the cars.

BigD wrote:Doesn't paint him in the best light. He seems very bitter.

Why is it that people like stampycat can make a good living on YouTube and he can't? I assumed it all came through the advertising which is the same as print surely? And without actually having to print mags or dvd's.

I think that's easy. People like stampycat appeal to youfs who suck up videos of people playing video games for some reason.
They don't watch bitter cart journos who aren't aged 9 like Clarkson. Adults, who Harris is trying to aim for, tend to watch TV, possibly via some subscription like Sky, our cable, not YouTube videos..

Corranga wrote:

BigD wrote:Doesn't paint him in the best light. He seems very bitter.

Why is it that people like stampycat can make a good living on YouTube and he can't? I assumed it all came through the advertising which is the same as print surely? And without actually having to print mags or dvd's.

I think that's easy. People like stampycat appeal to youfs who suck up videos of people playing video games for some reason.
They don't watch bitter cart journos who aren't aged 9 like Clarkson. Adults, who Harris is trying to aim for, tend to watch TV, possibly via some subscription like Sky, our cable, not YouTube videos..

Bang on the money.

Hang on a minute though. I'm continually being told that the older generation is higher in number than the kids so how does that work.

And I watch stampycat cat too so maybe I'm just the exception to the rule. Clinging on to my youth.

I have quite enjoyed some of Harris's writing and vids over the years, but this article is a just petulant whinging. In the last few years Harris has owned a Gallardo, a GT3 RS 4.0, a Ferrari FF, a Testarossa, Audi S4, and M5 among many other cars. Either he has another source of income, or freelance motoring journalism doesn't pay so badly after all...

And a 599. And no matter what the man maths are, 40k down and 1500 a month + is a lot for most people!

ryallm wrote:I have quite enjoyed some of Harris's writing and vids over the years, but this article is a just petulant whinging. In the last few years Harris has owned a Gallardo, a GT3 RS 4.0, a Ferrari FF, a Testarossa, Audi S4, and M5 among many other cars. Either he has another source of income, or freelance motoring journalism doesn't pay so badly after all...

I'd thought that too... He seems to do OK.

I'm reliably informed his wife isn't poor!

rossybee wrote:

robin wrote:Let's watch the generalisations, shall we?

Shouldn't that be in blue?

No, just my opinion. Sweeping generalisations are not in themselves against the rules.

Cheers,
Robin