Anything goes in here.....
-
Rag_It
- Posts: 4286
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 2:43 pm
- Location: Perth/Fife
Post
by Rag_It » Tue Aug 05, 2014 11:09 pm
Bit shocked to login and find nothing....

Thought i'd find some amusing opinions in amongst some serious points of view.
6 weeks to go and I imagine for quite a few people this will have been the first time that they've really tuned in to learn more.
I don't think either represented their cause particularly well, boy-ish behaviour, and no real victory for either, not to mention not many answers from either!
Dave
-
GBOBM
- Posts: 768
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 7:54 pm
- Location: Broxburn
Post
by GBOBM » Tue Aug 05, 2014 11:15 pm
both trying to "Win" rather than answer questions in case it let the other party score point on them.
You could see that there were questions that were talked around and that the question asker had a point, but they just wouldn't concede anything. I thought the questions towards the end showed them both in a better light where they agreed that it would be hard either way and it would need to be discussed to get the best out of it.
1999 MX5 1.8 SE - Pikey fun spec
2006 Focus 1.6TDCI - Dull, sensible, commuter spec
2006 Mondeo - Dull, sensible, towing spec
1992 Bay Mare - 1 Horsepower jumping machine
-
campbell
- Posts: 17342
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 12:42 pm
- Location: West Lothian
-
Contact:
Post
by campbell » Tue Aug 05, 2014 11:15 pm
Was on planes / trams / trains while the playground spat was underway. Intend to watch when available for replay.
-
a4drk
- Posts: 2222
- Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 11:26 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
Post
by a4drk » Tue Aug 05, 2014 11:27 pm
Tut must be out tonight .......

Two negatives make a positive but only in Scotland do two positives make a negative - 'Aye right.'
S2 Exige
BMW 435d M Sport - 375bhp..... and stops now (big brakes!

)
Work Horse - Ford Transit - Full of crap spec....... 170bhp one

-
PhilA
- Posts: 1258
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 2:03 am
- Location: Dundee
Post
by PhilA » Wed Aug 06, 2014 12:01 am
I want no Nuclear - either fuel or weapons - thats a big life thing for me so id like to vote yes for that reason,
however, I am British and want to remain part of the UK. Bit of a dilemma.
As for the debate, Salmond was slippery, and lost votes by not answering the currency question. Its fundamental.
I thought Darling was pretty good, I learnt some things about pension etc tonight.
So, overall, I think Salmond would gain voters who dont care about the currency thing, but he would lose the voters who do care about it.
I dont think Darling did anything too wrong
Phil
Ford Focus Sport
-
GregR
- Posts: 6933
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 1:45 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
Post
by GregR » Wed Aug 06, 2014 7:30 am
Watched ten minutes, got frustrated by some inane questions from the audience: "Mr Darling, do you have an address in Scotland?"
Darling: "yes."
Audience: "but you said you never voted for Mr Salmond"
Darling:"I voted for the Labour candidate, I don't see a problem with that."
Audience: ".....do you have an address in Scotland?"
The there were some good audience points that the chair didn't let Salmond/Darling answer.
Ferrari 458
Porsche 993 C2
Disco V
-
Lazydonkey
- Posts: 5139
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 6:24 pm
- Location: Glasgow
-
Contact:
Post
by Lazydonkey » Wed Aug 06, 2014 8:05 am
Tried to watch it from my hotel darn sarf but STV monumentally fcuk up and the website and app crashed.
Good idea to choose yesterday to open it up to non Scottish postcodes
Opinion i've read seems to think that Darling did better than expected and at worst got a "draw" and at best won. Certainly from speaking to Mrs Donkey (who hasn't decided yet) she was very very very annoyed with Alex not answering questions on currency. That alone could decide the vote for her.
Focus ST estate, i3s and more pushbikes than strictly necessary.
....did i ever tell you about the Evora and VX220 i used to own?
-
GBOBM
- Posts: 768
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 7:54 pm
- Location: Broxburn
Post
by GBOBM » Wed Aug 06, 2014 8:28 am
He said that the viable alternatives were listed on page 4 of the financial study, but he was essentially "shooting for the stars" and wanted the pound because it was best for the Scottish people. People didn't want to hear that though.
If he had just told people the other options and how they weren't his first choice and he'd be going down the route of the pound then he would have done himself a lot of favours.
1999 MX5 1.8 SE - Pikey fun spec
2006 Focus 1.6TDCI - Dull, sensible, commuter spec
2006 Mondeo - Dull, sensible, towing spec
1992 Bay Mare - 1 Horsepower jumping machine
-
tut
- Barefoot Ninja
- Posts: 22975
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 5:53 pm
- Location: Tut End, Glen of Newmill
Post
by tut » Wed Aug 06, 2014 8:31 am
a4drk wrote:Tut must be out tonight .......

Nope, I was watching Big Brother.
tut (in sarcastic mode)
-
tut
- Barefoot Ninja
- Posts: 22975
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 5:53 pm
- Location: Tut End, Glen of Newmill
Post
by tut » Wed Aug 06, 2014 8:37 am
ps:- bookie odds still 1/6 so they can rant away as much as they want.
tut
-
Rag_It
- Posts: 4286
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 2:43 pm
- Location: Perth/Fife
Post
by Rag_It » Wed Aug 06, 2014 8:58 am
Lazydonkey wrote: Certainly from speaking to Mrs Donkey (who hasn't decided yet) she was very very very annoyed with Alex not answering questions on currency. That alone could decide the vote for her.
He cannot answer a question he doesn't know the answer to, he's aiming for keeping the £ and will try his very best to bully his way to get it after a Yes vote, but until then he could have Plan B, Plan C, Plan D... none of which will be any more concrete than his desired plan A.
There are a lot of unanswered questions, it's a massive step into the dark and a huge gamble and for that reason alone, we'll not be seeing a Yes vote this year for sure.
-
pete
- Vexatious Litigant
- Posts: 4707
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 3:23 pm
- Location: Kilmarnock
Post
by pete » Wed Aug 06, 2014 9:39 am
They won't win because people want certainties for the future from the Yes campaign. They are not asking the same from the No campaign.
'99 - '03 Titanium S1 111S.
'03 - '10 Starlight Black S2 111S
'11 - '17 S2 135R
'17 - '19 S2 Exige S+
'23 - ?? Evora
-
j2 lot
- Posts: 7660
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:47 pm
- Location: Strathaven / Glasgow
Post
by j2 lot » Wed Aug 06, 2014 9:42 am
GregR wrote:Watched ten minutes,
The there were some good audience points that the chair didn't let Salmond/Darling answer.

some good questions ignored to go for glory, I though that Darling was given a harder time by the presenter than fishy was (for the bit I saw anyway)
I have never been a fan of AD and thought he wasn't best choice but was surprised he did rather well, Salmond as usual came across as condescending. Nothing I saw or heard made me switch to a 'yes' and I would thing there wasn't much to sway the undecided towards Independence.
2015 Lotus Evora
2022 Polestar 2 LRSM Plus
2023 Skoda Kodiaq Sportline
-
j2 lot
- Posts: 7660
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:47 pm
- Location: Strathaven / Glasgow
Post
by j2 lot » Wed Aug 06, 2014 9:49 am
pete wrote:They won't win because people want certainties for the future from the Yes campaign. They are not asking the same from the No campaign.
For the most part a No vote is for status quo so we already have (most of the) information available.
People resist change in almost every aspect of their lives and the Yes faction really don't understand that if you want to change peoples lives you need to feed them information about what that involves and offer them some positive actions and they simply haven't done that.
2015 Lotus Evora
2022 Polestar 2 LRSM Plus
2023 Skoda Kodiaq Sportline
-
Lazydonkey
- Posts: 5139
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 6:24 pm
- Location: Glasgow
-
Contact:
Post
by Lazydonkey » Wed Aug 06, 2014 9:56 am
j2 lot wrote:pete wrote:They won't win because people want certainties for the future from the Yes campaign. They are not asking the same from the No campaign.
For the most part a No vote is for status quo so we already have (most of the) information available.
People resist change in almost every aspect of their lives and the Yes faction really don't understand that if you want to change peoples lives you need to feed them information about what that involves and offer them some positive actions and they simply haven't done that.
100% agree.
The reality is that "yes" need to convince people that it will lead to a better place, "no" need to do nothing.
My big worry still remains that the utopia that has been painted still hasn't been costed and i'd be worried about a backlash when people realise that a higher GDP doesn't instantly mean we're all better off. If someone said "we'll have to take a hit fro 10 years then we'll be quids in" then i'd be much more inclined to listen closely.
There is a "set up cost" that comes with a yes vote that isn't there with a no vote - therefore i, and i'm sure others, need to be sure it's worth the investment. That's how i'd look at it if it was a work thing and i'm afraid that's how i look at things in my personal life. Passion has it's place but this isn't it.
Focus ST estate, i3s and more pushbikes than strictly necessary.
....did i ever tell you about the Evora and VX220 i used to own?