Zenos

Anything goes in here.....
Post Reply
User avatar
ryallm
Posts: 1800
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 3:56 pm
Location: At 15K preferably

Zenos

Post by ryallm » Thu Jan 09, 2014 2:45 pm

So, what do you all this of this? http://www.pistonheads.com/news/default ... ryId=29180 Looks great to me, and at a very attractive price. Shame Lotus can't/won't build something as bold as this these days.

Mark

User avatar
Dominic
Posts: 14446
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 10:14 am
Location: Milton Of Campsie
Contact:

Re: Zenos

Post by Dominic » Thu Jan 09, 2014 2:55 pm

I agree, it looks good, and is keenly priced. Looks like a decent spec too.

If they added a windscreen, doors and a soft top option (even if it meant costing a few K more) I think they would increase their market considerably. Sadly, as a bit of an unknown brand, I suspect it will never sell in big numbers, and is most likely going to be yet another sports car that disappears as quickly as it appeared. Hopefully I will be proven wrong though! Ariel managed it after all.

As good as it looks, my money would go to a used Lotus of some form.
http://www.dsaccountancy.com

1999 Lotus Elise Sport 135'99

User avatar
Shug
Posts: 13835
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:28 pm
Location: Deepest, Darkest Ayrshire

Re: Zenos

Post by Shug » Thu Jan 09, 2014 2:59 pm

Looks very very good, but utterly unproven company as yet. And I assume nobody's driven the car, so it might be a total lash-up. Looks good on paper, though. Hopefully they have a plan in place to let that sticker price make them money, or it'll be just another in a long list of great ideas that fail the financial test.

Kinda see where you're coming from with Lotus, but I still have the faith. With the 211 ceased for a while now and there being a proven market for it, I feel it won't be too long before we see another hardcore car from Lotus... Twas the Bahar era, trying to make it a Ferrari competitor, that killed of the proper hardcore, lightweight stuff and now the company is back making cars and on a more even keel, we might see the designers getting some leeway again.
2010 Honda VFR1200F
1990 Honda VFR400 NC30
2000 Honda VTR1000 SP1
2000 Kawasaki ZX-7R

User avatar
j2 lot
Posts: 7660
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:47 pm
Location: Strathaven / Glasgow

Re: Zenos

Post by j2 lot » Thu Jan 09, 2014 3:02 pm

It doesnt really move the game on from the opposition, X-Bow and Zuhl, although that might be unfair given the serious price advantage it has over both.
For some reason it doesnt grab you like it should and as above I would also go for a Lotus, or Caterham :?
2015 Lotus Evora
2022 Polestar 2 LRSM Plus
2023 Skoda Kodiaq Sportline

User avatar
rossybee
Posts: 11092
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 9:13 pm
Location: Dundee

Re: Zenos

Post by rossybee » Thu Jan 09, 2014 3:13 pm

I like that. And the E11 & E12 projects :thumbsup

The management team aren't exactly lacking in experience - both are ex-Lotus and Caterham, Ansar Ali being the big cheese.
Ross
---------
1972 Alfaholics Giulia Super
2000 Elise S1 Sport 160
2004 Bentley Conti GT
2017 Schkoda Yeti
2x Hairy GRs (not Toyota)

Now browsing the tech pages :mrgreen:

:cheers

woody
Posts: 5636
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 4:03 pm
Location: Southside Triangle

Re: Zenos

Post by woody » Thu Jan 09, 2014 3:29 pm

j2 lot wrote:It doesnt really move the game on from the opposition, X-Bow and Zuhl, although that might be unfair given the serious price advantage it has over both.
For some reason it doesnt grab you like it should and as above I would also go for a Lotus, or Caterham :?

I would say Xbow rivaling looks, Xbow beating speed and possibly Xbow matching or bettering dynamics at around half the price is moving the game on.

The finished article needs to be seen and driven of course.

User avatar
Shug
Posts: 13835
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:28 pm
Location: Deepest, Darkest Ayrshire

Re: Zenos

Post by Shug » Thu Jan 09, 2014 3:38 pm

From the minimal detail you can make from the article, it sounds like a backbone chassis (albeit in cheaply sourced carbon - clever) which Lotus moved on from in 1996. KTM has a full carbon tub like a two seat F3 car. And they've (KTM) managed to line it with lead, judging by kerbweight...

As you say, it really needs driven to see if the concept works, but from what you can glean from the article, the only innovative bit is they've used waste carbon to lower the price of making a carbon backbone where Lotus used steel for 50 years.

Really interesting potential yes, but at the moment, it's all chat - from a company with no name or history (which will hurt them, no matter that it shouldn't)
2010 Honda VFR1200F
1990 Honda VFR400 NC30
2000 Honda VTR1000 SP1
2000 Kawasaki ZX-7R

User avatar
ryallm
Posts: 1800
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 3:56 pm
Location: At 15K preferably

Re: Zenos

Post by ryallm » Thu Jan 09, 2014 3:45 pm

woody wrote:
j2 lot wrote:It doesnt really move the game on from the opposition, X-Bow and Zuhl, although that might be unfair given the serious price advantage it has over both.
For some reason it doesnt grab you like it should and as above I would also go for a Lotus, or Caterham :?

I would say Xbow rivaling looks, Xbow beating speed and possibly Xbow matching or bettering dynamics at around half the price is moving the game on.

The finished article needs to be seen and driven of course.
I agree. From what I have read Ansar Ali seems very tuned in to what the enthusiast market will take price wise for a stripped out hardcore car. The Xbow was the right idea, just too heavy and way too expensive. Unlike a lot of specialist start up sports car companies, you do get the feeling that these guys know what they are doing and might, might just make the business work.

woody
Posts: 5636
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 4:03 pm
Location: Southside Triangle

Re: Zenos

Post by woody » Thu Jan 09, 2014 3:54 pm

Shug wrote:From the minimal detail you can make from the article, it sounds like a backbone chassis (albeit in cheaply sourced carbon - clever) which Lotus moved on from in 1996. KTM has a full carbon tub like a two seat F3 car. And they've (KTM) managed to line it with lead, judging by kerbweight...

As you say, it really needs driven to see if the concept works, but from what you can glean from the article, the only innovative bit is they've used waste carbon to lower the price of making a carbon backbone where Lotus used steel for 50 years.

Really interesting potential yes, but at the moment, it's all chat - from a company with no name or history (which will hurt them, no matter that it shouldn't)
Not sure if you've read the earlier articles?

The bodywork is recycled carbon fibre. The backbone chassis (which looks quite a different from a Lotus one) is made of extruded aluminium, no surprise given the background of some of the team.

User avatar
Shug
Posts: 13835
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:28 pm
Location: Deepest, Darkest Ayrshire

Re: Zenos

Post by Shug » Thu Jan 09, 2014 4:05 pm

woody wrote:
Shug wrote:From the minimal detail you can make from the article, it sounds like a backbone chassis (albeit in cheaply sourced carbon - clever) which Lotus moved on from in 1996. KTM has a full carbon tub like a two seat F3 car. And they've (KTM) managed to line it with lead, judging by kerbweight...

As you say, it really needs driven to see if the concept works, but from what you can glean from the article, the only innovative bit is they've used waste carbon to lower the price of making a carbon backbone where Lotus used steel for 50 years.

Really interesting potential yes, but at the moment, it's all chat - from a company with no name or history (which will hurt them, no matter that it shouldn't)
Not sure if you've read the earlier articles?

The bodywork is recycled carbon fibre. The backbone chassis (which looks quite a different from a Lotus one) is made of extruded aluminium, no surprise given the background of some of the team.
Clearly not - fair play, that sounds a bit more interesting than I originally thought. :oops:

Wish them well with it, no matter what, don't get me wrong - I just think it's premature to start talking about moving the game on when they've not sold a car, or made a penny and nobody's actually driven one yet.
2010 Honda VFR1200F
1990 Honda VFR400 NC30
2000 Honda VTR1000 SP1
2000 Kawasaki ZX-7R

User avatar
campbell
Posts: 17336
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 12:42 pm
Location: West Lothian
Contact:

Re: Zenos

Post by campbell » Thu Jan 09, 2014 11:06 pm

The EVO review will make interesting reading.
http://www.rathmhor.com | Coaching, training, consultancy

User avatar
neil
Posts: 3259
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 1:55 pm
Location: Aberdeen

Re: Zenos

Post by neil » Fri Jan 10, 2014 12:59 am

I see they're based in Hethel. Might be worth a look in on Spazz
Exige V6

User avatar
mwmackenzie
Posts: 4311
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:22 pm
Location: Edinburgh

Re: Zenos

Post by mwmackenzie » Fri Jan 10, 2014 6:04 pm

Saw their website a while back when it was just specs and sketches, now the car is 'of the flesh' it looks great! I'm really looking forward to seeing the next generations in years to come as the sketches on their site look very tasty indeed :thumbsup
Mark MacKenzie

BMW Z4 3.0si, [R14 MMK] To be Ring ready soon

Merc family hack [R4 MMK] 85% MacKenzie'd Family Spec

User avatar
rossybee
Posts: 11092
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 9:13 pm
Location: Dundee

Re: Zenos

Post by rossybee » Thu Jan 23, 2014 9:33 pm

Ross
---------
1972 Alfaholics Giulia Super
2000 Elise S1 Sport 160
2004 Bentley Conti GT
2017 Schkoda Yeti
2x Hairy GRs (not Toyota)

Now browsing the tech pages :mrgreen:

:cheers

User avatar
C7Steve
Posts: 4515
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 2:00 pm
Location: Aberdeen

Re: Zenos

Post by C7Steve » Fri Jan 24, 2014 9:59 pm


Post Reply