Page 1 of 4

340R vs Caterham

Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 5:37 pm
by Andy G
Thoughts gents?

Looks like the R may be retiring in one way or the other!

Looking forward as ever,and seeing the Caterhams and 340's yesterday got me thinking!

Pro's / cons?

I only use the car at weekends now

cheers

Andy

Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 5:59 pm
by mckeann
get a caterham if you fit in it and just want a track car with occasional road, and you dont care what you look like. Its miles ahead of any lotus on the track, even a honda powered one.

Get a 340R if you want to look good whilst still having fun on track. you can pose, whilst still having something thats quicker than your 111R on the road and track.

I hope you have a garage for either.

Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 6:17 pm
by Andy G
i do indeed sir!

Decided I might as well get something quicker if I have to change :D

Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 6:51 pm
by mckeann
what you gonna do with the 111R though, fix it and sell it or sell it as it is??


P.S loads more experienced guys who actually own 340R's and Cat's so no doubt they will be able to offer you experience, but we talked about this very question on the nurburgring/spa trip

Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 7:39 pm
by LotusLee
How about an Ariel Atom 2 ? Thats what I would've got instead of the Exige but not ready for zero roof yet :)
The Atom2 was about 6 secs faster round the Top Gear track than the Exige S and almost matched the time of the Radical.
Lee

Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 8:34 pm
by jj
I am no expert on either but would rather the 340 as they are so damn cool. Atoms are neat, are they not bigger money?

Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:33 pm
by rossybee
Andy,

The beauty of a Caterham is that (like mine) you can swap between aero (like I am 95% of the time) and windscreen (& therefore roof :D ) if you are touring with a laydee :wink:

Next time you see me at KH I'll happily give you a pax run - 200bhp/490kg makes things quite lively :lol:

PM me if you have any questions :wink:



(totally unbiased faction :lol: )

Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2006 6:56 pm
by simon
340R for me, especially after seeing Scotty's today :thumbsup

Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2006 7:41 pm
by mac
For form over function then, for me, it has to be the 340R.


If your looking for more of a track toy, and you can fit in one, then a quick cat is probably the way to go.



Personally I'd love and Atom :D

Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2006 7:46 pm
by GregR
gutted for you mate.. I'd go for an S1 Exige though :)

Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2006 8:42 pm
by Rag_It
Andy go for a Caterham, i can't explain how mch i want one, esp when you will onl use it for weekends!!!! Perfffffect!

Dave

Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 12:02 am
by The_Rossatron
An Atom would be cool! You can pick up a new honda'd one for £23k no?

Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 7:35 am
by rossybee
shooomer wrote:I'd have a Caterham before a 340R, R300 knocking around £20k??
Paul - there are a few very nice R300s around this mark at the mo :wink:

Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 7:50 am
by mac
The_Rossatron wrote:An Atom would be cool! You can pick up a new honda'd one for £23k no?

I think so - but you want the S/C one with the uprated brakes which comes in just above 31k IIRC.


They have a fairly cool website too



Mac

Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 11:08 am
by Shug
Andy - if you do go Atom, first thing to do would be to take it to Mark at Banchory. They are supposedly really setup dependant and have been known to come out of the 'factory' (shed) with fairly interesting handling... :shock: