From the technical stuff like is there problems zoning this, cost of installation v a traditional radiator system to general user experience like is it as controlable, does it provide adequate heat in winter, cost of running etc.
many thanks

Sorry but simply isn't true - there are products out there that are designed for this purpose and, when fitted correctly, will be trouble free. It is two winters since I put my oak floors down and they're as good as the day they were laid.H8OAG wrote:Wooden floors irrespective of quality will warp through time. He has re- done his own house to combat this.
No, the main difference is that traditionally radiators are either on or off with the main reason that the heat transfer from the radiator to the air is fairly quick therefore a room can go from cold to warm/hot in a resonable period of time. The UFH system work differently where you select a room temperature to suit via the thermostat and then let the system maintain that at all times so in summer you'll have the thermostats down and in the winter higher. That's not to say that you can't heat a room reasonably quickly with UFH from cold it's just more controllable to work on a desired room temperature rather than a cyclic heat up/cool down as with a radiator system. Hope that makes sense..........DJ wrote:.... For those that have used terms like 'gentle/continuous background heat' (Northernpar and David) does that mean you think radiators are still required over and above the UFH to obtain a decent room temperature in the middle of winter ?