Today I test drove this...

Anything goes in here.....
Gareth
Posts: 4959
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 12:19 pm
Location: The Moon

Today I test drove this...

Post by Gareth » Sun Oct 21, 2007 5:22 pm

So I need a daily runner having sold the Saab. Criteria:
5 doors
Cheap to run
Decent handling

Having read all the positive reports I tried out the Panda 100HP....not something I put on my shortlist which included the Focus ST170, Astra SRi and Leon Cupra.

Initially impressions is it's quite "cool"....well sort of. It's a small car but doesn't feel tool small inside. I'm 6'2 and had plenty headroom. It's a 1.4 16V with a 6speed box which is very direct. Group 5 insurance and tax will be cheap. Of course it's not fast but punchy. Turn in is quite good but it is a little bouncy over country roads probably down to the springs ( I read the Evo review who were trialling different springs to try and cure the problem) and the short wheel base.

Here's a few pics. I'm still undecided....

Image

Image

Image

User avatar
thinfourth
Posts: 3177
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 12:06 pm
Location: Playing in the mud near aberdeen

Post by thinfourth » Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:17 pm

I like the wee suzuki swift that seems a nicer car inside but far harder to spell

User avatar
Skyenet
Posts: 972
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 6:29 am
Location: 90 seconds from Strathclyde Park

Post by Skyenet » Sun Oct 21, 2007 7:02 pm

I seem to remember Uldis buying a Fiat Panda as a runaround after being impressed by my wee Punto on MexiTowers. Mine was just a base model but was very pleased with it, especially on our Europe trip. Was a bit nippier than my new base model Corsa as well, but still prefer the roomier, more modern Corsa. I had a test drive in the 4x4 Punto and liked it but a bit slower and about £3,000 more (I think) than the base model Punto I ended up getting new for less than £6000
Vauxhall Astra 1.4 Sports Hatch - not as slow as my old Corsa :-)

BMW R1200GS - Fast as F@ck spec - 0-60 in 3.2 secs

User avatar
Bada Bing!
Posts: 266
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: West Coast

Post by Bada Bing! » Sun Oct 21, 2007 7:37 pm

I like the Swift, but I would be tempted to wait until the new year and buy a 500 with some lowering springs, than a Panda.
Gaz

Image

"Ram it baw deep"

User avatar
smee
Posts: 1907
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:00 pm
Location: Inverurie
Contact:

Post by smee » Sun Oct 21, 2007 8:41 pm

Honestly try the swift, I had a shot in one and was very impressed.
S1 Elise - LRG MMC
Exige 390 LRG
GR Yaris
Leighton T6.1

User avatar
Bada Bing!
Posts: 266
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: West Coast

Post by Bada Bing! » Sun Oct 21, 2007 8:56 pm

The Swift is a cheap BMW Mini, minus the c0ck of an image, IMO.
Gaz

Image

"Ram it baw deep"

woody
Posts: 5637
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 4:03 pm
Location: Southside Triangle

Post by woody » Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:03 pm

Bada Bing! wrote:The Swift is a cheap BMW Mini, minus the c0ck of an image, IMO.
IMO, it's not remotely in the same league as a mini, the interior is tat and poorly put together.

New Fabia? I'd eat one.

User avatar
Bada Bing!
Posts: 266
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: West Coast

Post by Bada Bing! » Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:09 pm

Would you really rather drive a Mini though? Christ they're tragic.
Gaz

Image

"Ram it baw deep"

User avatar
caleebra
Posts: 414
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 12:21 pm
Location: Aberdeen

Post by caleebra » Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:44 pm

woody wrote:
Bada Bing! wrote:The Swift is a cheap BMW Mini, minus the c0ck of an image, IMO.
IMO, it's not remotely in the same league as a mini, the interior is tat and poorly put together.
I for one am glad the Swift is not in the "same league" as the bulbous overpriced 0.5 Series. The fit and finish might not be up to German standards but that does not make it a bad car!!

There is nothing wrong with the interior, it's a step above most jap efforts (not hard I'll grant you) and in the BASE SPEC model you get driver, passenger, and side airbags, 6 speaker MP3/WMA stereo, ISOFIX kids seat mounts, 60/40 folding rear seats and stereo controls on a nice small steering wheel (would be better trimmed in leather though...).

The 1.3 deisel comes with the highly regarded Fiat multijet engine, but I'm getting 40-odd mpg from the 1.3 16V petrol. No rocketship obviously but it revs willingly and is a different kind of fun! And my first service will cost me £90.

I wanted a Panda but ultimately could not persuade SWMBO on the looks, so the Swift was a compromise. Both are exceptionally cheap new cars. Gillanders were decent to deal with, haggled a good price. I'd have loved to get a Sport, but for all I need the car for (commuting and the odd shopping trip, winter motoring etc) the base model was all I needed.
Lee
[flamesuit] VX220 owner[/flamesuit]

User avatar
thinfourth
Posts: 3177
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 12:06 pm
Location: Playing in the mud near aberdeen

Post by thinfourth » Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:47 pm

I'm amused by elise owners debating the interior standard of other makers

woody
Posts: 5637
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 4:03 pm
Location: Southside Triangle

Post by woody » Sun Oct 21, 2007 10:12 pm

Bada Bing! wrote:Would you really rather drive a Mini though? Christ they're tragic.
Yup, to be honest I would, even though i think the mini dosen't live up to the hype. I have experience of both, when it comes down to it the seating height alone in the mini compared to the swift would win it for me. Thats all given that it's a new mini we're talking about and not a new new mini, which are :puke :D

My 1/4 of a million mile BM is probably, water pump aside, the best car all round car I've had, minis, MINI & elise included, for pure comedy value it wins the day.

User avatar
Lazydonkey
Posts: 5139
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 6:24 pm
Location: Glasgow
Contact:

Post by Lazydonkey » Sun Oct 21, 2007 10:15 pm

I quite like my panda :)

one of my dads mates is a fiat dealer and he was saying they get more warranty claims on toyotas (he also has toyota and alfa) than he does on new fiats.

if you can live with the image the panda is excellent. don't pay more than 8.5k for the 100hp tho
Focus ST estate, i3s and more pushbikes than strictly necessary.

....did i ever tell you about the Evora and VX220 i used to own?

User avatar
tuscan_thunder
Posts: 1189
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:33 pm
Location: Aberdeenshire

Post by tuscan_thunder » Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:15 am

Bada Bing! wrote:Would you really rather drive a Mini though? Christ they're tragic.
Mini's a great car - I don't give a monkeys about image. Best FWD car I've ever driven.

Panda's good, the Swift's ok apart from the steering which is a but too much like Angel Delight (light and fluffy).

The 500 will be stupid money for a sensibly specced when it comes out.
Mair throttle, less brake

User avatar
max1966
Posts: 410
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 2:24 pm
Location: Edinburgh

Post by max1966 » Mon Oct 22, 2007 1:59 pm

G

the fabia Vrs is still the best everyday runaround I've ever had, not punchy just downright fast, economical, always, well put together and excellent residuals.

The only thing that lets it down is the light grey interior, but there are black leather retrims available
if evolution don't take care of it, redesign it

Gareth
Posts: 4959
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 12:19 pm
Location: The Moon

Post by Gareth » Mon Oct 22, 2007 2:13 pm

max1966 wrote:G

the fabia Vrs is still the best everyday runaround I've ever had, not punchy just downright fast, economical, always, well put together and excellent residuals.

The only thing that lets it down is the light grey interior, but there are black leather retrims available
Before I say this...I have ruled out the Panda. I just wanted to see what all the fuss was about... but the Skoda...it's a Skoda. Sometime it can look sporty but other/most time...it's looks like the base model. Engine is mega though.

Post Reply