Really? No-one commenting on tonights debate?

Anything goes in here.....
pete
Vexatious Litigant
Posts: 4707
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 3:23 pm
Location: Kilmarnock

Re: Really? No-one commenting on tonights debate?

Post by pete » Thu Aug 07, 2014 2:17 pm

scott_e wrote:
j2 lot wrote: Latest figures are, Scots currently get £1632 or 19% more identifiable public spending per head than England under the Barnett formula.
Any apparently the fomula will not change on a NO vote. Seem to recall there was mounting pressure for reforming it too.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politic ... dence.html

You obviously read the article differently from me ;)

I read "No plans to change Barnett formula if Scots reject independence" - (my emphasis).

Not even that he wasn't intending to change it, just that he had made no plans to. Some of his colleagues had voiced the opinion that it should change though, although they too had made no plans to actually change it.

:D

At the end of the day no-one is going to win this referendum.
'99 - '03 Titanium S1 111S.
'03 - '10 Starlight Black S2 111S
'11 - '17 S2 135R
'17 - '19 S2 Exige S+
'23 - ?? Evora

Rosssco
Posts: 656
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 9:19 pm
Location: Aberdeen

Re: Really? No-one commenting on tonights debate?

Post by Rosssco » Thu Aug 07, 2014 2:27 pm

If the UK government wants to continue to retain Scotland as part of the UK, I would suggest significant reform to the Barnett formula such that it left future Scots worse off, would only feed nationalist sentiment up here further, hence I would doubt it would be politically advantageous for them to do so...

Ultimately, its no more of a guarantee than any of the stuff that the nationalist propose.
VX220 SC
M135i
Parajet V3 Moster 185

User avatar
scott_e
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 5:13 pm
Location: Broughty ferry

Re: Really? No-one commenting on tonights debate?

Post by scott_e » Thu Aug 07, 2014 2:35 pm

pete wrote:
scott_e wrote: You obviously read the article differently from me ;)
:lol:

User avatar
tonyg
Posts: 1148
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 5:06 pm
Location: Now with half an engine

Re: Really? No-one commenting on tonights debate?

Post by tonyg » Thu Aug 07, 2014 3:12 pm

I made a point of not watching it because i knew what would happen, childish name throwing, point scoring and blame dodging.

Those of us who are old enough to have voted in the first Scottish referendum will remember that the Scots voted for it with no information whatsoever on what was going to be run in Scotland and what was still going to be run by Westminster.

What did we get? - a parliament building that was originally going to cost "around £10 million" came in at over 40 times that. More hot air being spoken by more politicians than before and more bureaucracy .

Why would anyone be stupid enough to think that it would be any different this time?

Always remember Rule 1 -

Government is NOT for the benefit of those who are governed.
Now with half an engine

User avatar
Scotty C
Meat
Posts: 8352
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 12:11 am
Location: Aberdeen

Re: Really? No-one commenting on tonights debate?

Post by Scotty C » Thu Aug 07, 2014 3:12 pm

if you were to give the Scottish government a £10m budget to build an office and they spend £414m. What chances do we have of them controlling the country finances.
"Here for a good time not a long time"

User avatar
GBOBM
Posts: 768
Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 7:54 pm
Location: Broxburn

Re: Really? No-one commenting on tonights debate?

Post by GBOBM » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:04 pm

Scotty C wrote:if you were to give the Scottish government a £10m budget to build an office and they spend £414m. What chances do we have of them controlling the country finances.

Maybe we should give the government and councils another chance. How about a transport project like the trams........oh wait a minute.
1999 MX5 1.8 SE - Pikey fun spec
2006 Focus 1.6TDCI - Dull, sensible, commuter spec
2006 Mondeo - Dull, sensible, towing spec
1992 Bay Mare - 1 Horsepower jumping machine

User avatar
Dominic
Posts: 14450
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 10:14 am
Location: Milton Of Campsie
Contact:

Re: Really? No-one commenting on tonights debate?

Post by Dominic » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:56 pm

GBOBM wrote:
Scotty C wrote:if you were to give the Scottish government a £10m budget to build an office and they spend £414m. What chances do we have of them controlling the country finances.

Maybe we should give the government and councils another chance. How about a transport project like the trams........oh wait a minute.
:damnfunny

That's just Edinburgh - things are better in the west.... M74 extension delivered early and under budget. :thumbsup :lol:
http://www.dsaccountancy.com

1999 Lotus Elise Sport 135'99

User avatar
GBOBM
Posts: 768
Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 7:54 pm
Location: Broxburn

Re: Really? No-one commenting on tonights debate?

Post by GBOBM » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:58 pm

That's because they quoted eleventy gajillion pounds to start with.
1999 MX5 1.8 SE - Pikey fun spec
2006 Focus 1.6TDCI - Dull, sensible, commuter spec
2006 Mondeo - Dull, sensible, towing spec
1992 Bay Mare - 1 Horsepower jumping machine

User avatar
Lazydonkey
Posts: 5139
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 6:24 pm
Location: Glasgow
Contact:

Re: Really? No-one commenting on tonights debate?

Post by Lazydonkey » Thu Aug 07, 2014 5:08 pm

Imagine the overspend if they replace every single government body we have. We could be paying for it for decades.
Focus ST estate, i3s and more pushbikes than strictly necessary.

....did i ever tell you about the Evora and VX220 i used to own?

User avatar
Mikie711
Posts: 4347
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 11:21 pm
Location: Aberdeenshire.
Contact:

Re: Really? No-one commenting on tonights debate?

Post by Mikie711 » Thu Aug 07, 2014 5:26 pm

They will all pale into insignificance once Aberdeen council finish the WPR. The cost over run on that will dwarf every other government project by some considerable margin.
Elise S2 260
BMW M2 Comp
RRS HST
BMW R1300GS

User avatar
tut
Barefoot Ninja
Posts: 22975
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 5:53 pm
Location: Tut End, Glen of Newmill

Re: Really? No-one commenting on tonights debate?

Post by tut » Thu Aug 07, 2014 5:27 pm

Do you think that if I voted Yes we would finally get an Aberdeen Bypass, or even a Motorway North of Perth?

Can you imagine England's third largest City not having a Bypass around it, never mind a Motorway which they all have?

tut

User avatar
GregR
Posts: 6933
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 1:45 pm
Location: Edinburgh

Re: Really? No-one commenting on tonights debate?

Post by GregR » Thu Aug 07, 2014 6:46 pm

tut wrote:
Can you imagine England's third largest City not having a Bypass around it, never mind a Motorway which they all have?

tut
Must compare apples with apples.

Birmingham 1.074m people;
Aberdeen: 274k people
Ferrari 458
Porsche 993 C2
Disco V

User avatar
neil
Posts: 3259
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 1:55 pm
Location: Aberdeen

Re: Really? No-one commenting on tonights debate?

Post by neil » Thu Aug 07, 2014 7:08 pm

tut wrote:Do you think that if I voted Yes we would finally get an Aberdeen Bypass, or even a Motorway North of Perth?
No chance. Just like Westminster can't see north of Birmingham, Hollyrood can't see further north than Queensferry
Exige V6

User avatar
tut
Barefoot Ninja
Posts: 22975
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 5:53 pm
Location: Tut End, Glen of Newmill

Re: Really? No-one commenting on tonights debate?

Post by tut » Thu Aug 07, 2014 8:07 pm

Come on, we are worth at least a four to one ratio to them.

tut

User avatar
Mikie711
Posts: 4347
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 11:21 pm
Location: Aberdeenshire.
Contact:

Re: Really? No-one commenting on tonights debate?

Post by Mikie711 » Thu Aug 07, 2014 10:16 pm

Remember the volume of traffic on the Sunday we went to the chunnel. When have you ever seen that much traffic on the A90 on weekday never mind a Sunday.
Elise S2 260
BMW M2 Comp
RRS HST
BMW R1300GS

Post Reply