Watch lovers?
Re: Watch lovers?
Although I do not have or wear one Mass, I am not blinkered, and I appreciate anything that is well engineered and crafted.
I am just a little queer in that I have never worn jewellery, not even a wedding ring, which makes me different than the norm.
tut
I am just a little queer in that I have never worn jewellery, not even a wedding ring, which makes me different than the norm.
tut
- Modena Scotland
- Posts: 2871
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 11:53 am
- Location: Scottish borders
Re: Watch lovers?


I don't know driving in another way which isn't risky. Each one has to improve himself. Each driver has its limit. My limit is a little bit further than other's.
A Senna
Shared SE Calendar
Re: Watch lovers?
Absolutely.
tut
tut
Re: Watch lovers?
Well, its 1969 technology is showing already. It lost 15 seconds in its first 24 hours...
211
958
958
-
- Posts: 956
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 3:31 pm
Re: Watch lovers?
With you on that Tut (more or less). I don't ware jewellery of any type and won't wear a wedding ring when I get married next year. I do however wear a watch. Nothing bling, don't like that at all but something plain, robust and well engineered. No gold, no diamonds. Black face and stainless steel.tut wrote:Although I do not have or wear one Mass, I am not blinkered, and I appreciate anything that is well engineered and crafted.
I am just a little queer in that I have never worn jewellery, not even a wedding ring, which makes me different than the norm.
tut
I think of a watch as a tool not jewellery although maybe I am kidding myself.
I do quite like Omega but don't have one.
2p
Graham
Re: Watch lovers?
What was the chat about a Deep Sea Sea Dweller then Mr C?
Ferrari 458
Porsche 993 C2
Disco V
Porsche 993 C2
Disco V
-
- Posts: 956
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 3:31 pm
Re: Watch lovers?
Like I said:GregR wrote:What was the chat about a Deep Sea Sea Dweller then Mr C?
Titanium S1 111S (gla) wrote:Nothing bling, don't like that at all but something plain, robust and well engineered. No gold, no diamonds. Black face and stainless steel.
Graham
Re: Watch lovers?
Met a guy last week and he had on a DeepSea, so tried it on. No way I could wear it but it was an awesome piece. Must have been at least half the weight of my Sub again and twice as thick 

Re: Watch lovers?
Oooh, meaow. I like my cyclopsGregR wrote:At least it doesn't have a cyclops though

-
- Posts: 956
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 3:31 pm
Re: Watch lovers?
jj wrote:Met a guy last week and he had on a DeepSea, so tried it on. No way I could wear it but it was an awesome piece. Must have been at least half the weight of my Sub again and twice as thick
Exactly the problem I had. The new DeepSea is just too big and I don’t like the cyclops on the Sub. So I managed to find a new, unworn old model DeepSea.GregR wrote:At least it doesn't have a cyclops though

Graham
Re: Watch lovers?
you mean a Sea Dweller? If so, and its a Z serial.. you could be on to a pretty wee investment there!
Ferrari 458
Porsche 993 C2
Disco V
Porsche 993 C2
Disco V
-
- Posts: 956
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 3:31 pm
Re: Watch lovers?
Sorry, yes. I do, it is and that would be nice.GregR wrote:you mean a Sea Dweller? If so, and its a Z serial.. you could be on to a pretty wee investment there!
I don't really intend to sell, but it is good to know that if I did I would get my money back.
Graham