139mph in a 60

Anything goes in here.....
User avatar
flyingscot68
Posts: 1877
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 2:31 pm
Location: East Kilbride
Contact:

139mph in a 60

Post by flyingscot68 » Tue Sep 02, 2014 10:30 pm

Filtering is not illegal, in moving or stationary traffic. It is in some Euro countries though, probably Switzerland. ;-)
You should get an open face lid, much easier for getting your cheese fix on the move :-)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

User avatar
Doc883
Posts: 1496
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:17 pm
Location: Livingston

Re: 139mph in a 60

Post by Doc883 » Wed Sep 03, 2014 12:48 pm

flyingscot68 wrote:Filtering is not illegal, in moving or stationary traffic. It is in some Euro countries though, probably Switzerland. ;-)
You should get an open face lid, much easier for getting your cheese fix on the move :-)
Not illegal but there has to be a time where it's not advisable i.e when the 2 lanes of traffic are traveling at the correct speed for the road/conditions. Just this morning on the M8 a complete nugget of a biker was weaving in and out of traffic in excess of 70mph whilst traffic was flowing freely. Clearly no respect for the danger he was placing on both himself and other road users.
This article has a number of case studies where bikers have come a cropper filtering and for the ones I read the vast majority of the blame was apportioned to the biker.
http://www.markthompsonlaw.com/motorcyc ... -examples/
Last edited by Doc883 on Wed Sep 03, 2014 12:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
S-Max Titanium X Sport - Wife Spec
Audi RS3 Quattro spec all weather beast

User avatar
Doc883
Posts: 1496
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:17 pm
Location: Livingston

Re: 139mph in a 60

Post by Doc883 » Wed Sep 03, 2014 12:51 pm

j2 lot wrote: I think we should ban cyclists then I wouldn't be nursing a broken shoulder having been knocked off my motorbike by one :evil:
How does that work for your insurance as presumably the cyclist wouldn't have cover for you to claim against. Were the Police involved and did they apportion blame to either party or simply a case of having to claim off your own insurance ?
S-Max Titanium X Sport - Wife Spec
Audi RS3 Quattro spec all weather beast

User avatar
Shug
Posts: 13835
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:28 pm
Location: Deepest, Darkest Ayrshire

Re: 139mph in a 60

Post by Shug » Wed Sep 03, 2014 12:56 pm

Doc883 wrote:
flyingscot68 wrote:Filtering is not illegal, in moving or stationary traffic. It is in some Euro countries though, probably Switzerland. ;-)
You should get an open face lid, much easier for getting your cheese fix on the move :-)
Not illegal but there has to be a time where it's not advisable i.e when the 2 lanes of traffic are traveling at the correct speed for the road/conditions. Just this morning on the M8 a complete nugget of a biker was weaving in and out of traffic in excess of 70mph whilst traffic was flowing freely. Clearly not respect for the danger he was placing on both himself and other road users.
This article has a number of case studies where bikers have come a cropper filtering and for the ones I read the vast majority of the blame was apportioned to the biker.
http://www.markthompsonlaw.com/motorcyc ... -examples/
Of course there is. There's a police manual that most folk quote (Roadcraft) which describes filtering in slow moving traffic as a valid course of action. There's also mention of it in the Highway Code.

However, weaving in and out of traffic at 70mph isn't filtering - it's being a dick.
2010 Honda VFR1200F
1990 Honda VFR400 NC30
2000 Honda VTR1000 SP1
2000 Kawasaki ZX-7R

Post Reply